Election of BHO will NOT prove USA is tolerant!

Many whites (look at the polls and discussion groups: Google Rasmussen and Yahoo) say that by electing BHO as the first mulatto President, it will prove that USA has atoned for its racist past and we can announce that we are no longer racist.

Ugh! Ding! Thanks for playing!

That's not going to happen. Why? Those that believe that America is racist are not going to let the honkies off the hook that easily. Why give up the advantage once you gain it? As BHO said in a speech to ACORN at their 2007 national convention: "You will be there to help me shape my administration and its issues..." "You will be apart of the discussion that will determine my administration's perspectives..."

Now if you clearly think that BHO has nothing to do with ACORN has his new "sanitized" web site wants you to believe, then all you have to do is listen to his speech-making. He is telling you what he will do once elected to the White House.

BTW (by the way), if blacks can use the "nigger" word (there own words) to describe themselves with impunity, then a white blogger can use the "honky" word under the same conditions, no? YES!

OK, there, we have the discourse on the table. I believe that it is necessary and useful for BHO to be elected to the Presidency. It is the only way that people may, I say may, come alive and get involved as they see the USA taken from a capitalist representative democracy to a socialistic representative democracy.

I still believe that we still be able to "vote" for our representatives, but the government will have become so intrusive and invasive that only left-leaning candidates will rise to the elections.

BHO as President even with a SMDC (super-majority Democratic Congress) doesn't bother me. I believe that events unfold for a purpose and this is what is necessary for the USA at this time. The USA needs to be reduced to a 3rd world, European-style socialistic country for the future of the planet to work out as it should.