BHO's big difference from JFK is that he is a socialist. Come on now, let's not lie about it. BHO's training, up-bringing, education, and early community organization experiences have all been in the venue of making the USA a socialist country.
Why do liberals/Democrats have such a problem with that label? I have more respect for people that don't try and hide their stripes, but are willing to be up front and open about what they believe in. When they try to hide their true beliefs and ideologies, it makes me think that there is something to this need for distraction or obfuscation.
BHO, on the other hand, doesn't see this as a problem. When directly asked, "Do you regret making the statement about spreading the wealth around?" BHO answered directly and defiantly, "No, I don't!" BHO simply can't understand why anyone should be upset with this concept. To him the rich can afford it and should be patriotic enough to allow it, and the poor should embrace it as their right to other people's money. BHO believes these concepts are truisms in a progressive, modern society.
Ask yourself? How would I feel if I had to go to work everyday and work until 11:30 AM every day just so that amount of my income that I personally worked for could be taken by the government and then given to someone else "less fortunate" than I. That is not the American Dream, folks. The American Dream is based on opportunity, not charity.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him "each day and make him dependent on your charity"; teach a man how to fish and you feed him "and the small business employees and customers he creates for processing and canning fish." (my update to the old adage)
What BHO doesn't understand is the impact these concepts will have on the production and creation of wealth in a free society, and there may be "gotcha." Maybe he does understand, sneaky, eh?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment